<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wallace&#8217;s Nationwide team wins Daytona penalty appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/</link>
	<description>The place for NASCAR news and rumors where the discussion rages...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sive</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-36081</link>
		<dc:creator>Sive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-36081</guid>
		<description>[quote comment="36067"]Just like anything else in the car that will allow Down Force. Take it off or loosen the Bolts.

A show was done on this exact lid not long ago and it was stated that a car that had the lip loosened or taken off, would allow the Car to have such Down force that it would Drive like it was stuck to the Track.

So go Figure why the 99, Edwards car was so good.  I think the Win should be taken away in the future and these things will STOP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/quote]

Mel, Edwards car was good because, it's an Edwards kind of track. The penalized part really wouldn't offer a performance-enhancement of any kind. It had to do with the oil tank reservoir cover not being fastened securely, it's nowhere near an aero-enhancement. He'll be good again this weekend at Atlanta (three-in-a-row isn't an out-there prediction). Take away the win!?! HA!! The penalized part here has no remote correlation to such a severe penalty, if he's good, he's good and people just have to deal with it. Also, your saying that Edwards should be made the example for a penalty that's no where even in the nieghborhood to being as bad as others in years past, to top it off you didn't even know what the penalty was. Hopefully NASCAR will not maintain the penalty, Edwards may have been rough around the edges at a few points last year, but I can say this, he IS NOT a cheater. No one should cheapen his ability or character with excuses, he's just a great race-car driver!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="quoter_comment_header"><a href="http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-36067" title="View original comment"><cite>Mel</cite> wrote:</a></p>
<blockquote cite="http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-36067"><p>
Just like anything else in the car that will allow Down Force. Take it off or loosen the Bolts.</p>
<p>A show was done on this exact lid not long ago and it was stated that a car that had the lip loosened or taken off, would allow the Car to have such Down force that it would Drive like it was stuck to the Track.</p>
<p>So go Figure why the 99, Edwards car was so good.  I think the Win should be taken away in the future and these things will STOP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Mel, Edwards car was good because, it&#8217;s an Edwards kind of track. The penalized part really wouldn&#8217;t offer a performance-enhancement of any kind. It had to do with the oil tank reservoir cover not being fastened securely, it&#8217;s nowhere near an aero-enhancement. He&#8217;ll be good again this weekend at Atlanta (three-in-a-row isn&#8217;t an out-there prediction). Take away the win!?! HA!! The penalized part here has no remote correlation to such a severe penalty, if he&#8217;s good, he&#8217;s good and people just have to deal with it. Also, your saying that Edwards should be made the example for a penalty that&#8217;s no where even in the nieghborhood to being as bad as others in years past, to top it off you didn&#8217;t even know what the penalty was. Hopefully NASCAR will not maintain the penalty, Edwards may have been rough around the edges at a few points last year, but I can say this, he IS NOT a cheater. No one should cheapen his ability or character with excuses, he&#8217;s just a great race-car driver!! <img src='http://autoracingsport.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-36067</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-36067</guid>
		<description>Just like anything else in the car that will allow Down Force. Take it off or loosen the Bolts.  

A show was done on this exact lid not long ago and it was stated that a car that had the lip loosened or taken off, would allow the Car to have such Down force that it would Drive like it was stuck to the Track. 

So go Figure why the 99, Edwards car was so good.  I think the Win should be taken away in the future and these things will STOP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like anything else in the car that will allow Down Force. Take it off or loosen the Bolts.  </p>
<p>A show was done on this exact lid not long ago and it was stated that a car that had the lip loosened or taken off, would allow the Car to have such Down force that it would Drive like it was stuck to the Track. </p>
<p>So go Figure why the 99, Edwards car was so good.  I think the Win should be taken away in the future and these things will STOP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truex1fan</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35932</link>
		<dc:creator>Truex1fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35932</guid>
		<description>thanks for the info buddy, the question of what taking hte cap off would do for the car has been bothering me and my buddies all day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the info buddy, the question of what taking hte cap off would do for the car has been bothering me and my buddies all day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fisha695</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35930</link>
		<dc:creator>Fisha695</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35930</guid>
		<description>I doubt it was a malfunction with all of them, maybe a purpose made malfunction, but not an accidental one.

As far as what it does, it helps evacuate air from under the car. The oil tank which is behind the seat sits in a box, that box has a lid on it because the oil lines run from the tank (inside the car) to the underside of the car and then to the engine, so without the lid on that box, air can come up through the openings for the line (heck entire bottom of box might be open I'm not sure) but anyway air comes up through the box from under the car and with the lid off it'll help the car some because there would not be the air under the car creating lift/drag.

Howie might be able to explain maybe even show us with a pic of how exactly it is set up on the Cup/Nationwide cars, but what I said is a pretty good description based off what I have seen/read/heard in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it was a malfunction with all of them, maybe a purpose made malfunction, but not an accidental one.</p>
<p>As far as what it does, it helps evacuate air from under the car. The oil tank which is behind the seat sits in a box, that box has a lid on it because the oil lines run from the tank (inside the car) to the underside of the car and then to the engine, so without the lid on that box, air can come up through the openings for the line (heck entire bottom of box might be open I&#8217;m not sure) but anyway air comes up through the box from under the car and with the lid off it&#8217;ll help the car some because there would not be the air under the car creating lift/drag.</p>
<p>Howie might be able to explain maybe even show us with a pic of how exactly it is set up on the Cup/Nationwide cars, but what I said is a pretty good description based off what I have seen/read/heard in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truex1fan</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35925</link>
		<dc:creator>Truex1fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35925</guid>
		<description>does anybody else think that there may be a malfunction with the lid itself? im just wondering with so many teams having this problem or is everyone getting caught at once lol. Futher more what would removing hte cap do for the car? im just wondering, what does everyone think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anybody else think that there may be a malfunction with the lid itself? im just wondering with so many teams having this problem or is everyone getting caught at once lol. Futher more what would removing hte cap do for the car? im just wondering, what does everyone think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hendrickfan</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35918</link>
		<dc:creator>hendrickfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35918</guid>
		<description>Depends if they appealed..  if they didn't.. they are wishing they did</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends if they appealed..  if they didn&#8217;t.. they are wishing they did</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fisha695</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35913</link>
		<dc:creator>Fisha695</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35913</guid>
		<description>There have been problems with it in the past, but I think this is the first time that so many teams have been caught with it in a small timeframe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been problems with it in the past, but I think this is the first time that so many teams have been caught with it in a small timeframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35908</guid>
		<description>I agree w/ Fisha. Off is not attached at all, unsecured is attached, but not screwed on tightly. 

Either way, though, the fact is it was against the rules and could possibly have been a competitive advantage. It's very suspicious to me that all these teams suddenly have problems with this specific part and I don't remember anyone ever having a problem with it in the past.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree w/ Fisha. Off is not attached at all, unsecured is attached, but not screwed on tightly. </p>
<p>Either way, though, the fact is it was against the rules and could possibly have been a competitive advantage. It&#8217;s very suspicious to me that all these teams suddenly have problems with this specific part and I don&#8217;t remember anyone ever having a problem with it in the past&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fisha695</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35905</link>
		<dc:creator>Fisha695</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35905</guid>
		<description>I don't really think thats making shades of gray. Off is off, unsecured is on, but not tight.

And to the people who reply and it comes up with somebody else's name, the easy way to avoid that is to register.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really think thats making shades of gray. Off is off, unsecured is on, but not tight.</p>
<p>And to the people who reply and it comes up with somebody else&#8217;s name, the easy way to avoid that is to register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr88fan</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35898</link>
		<dc:creator>jr88fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35898</guid>
		<description>Well that's interesting. 

Hmmm ...."Off" and "unsecured". That's making shades of gray now isn't it. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s interesting. </p>
<p>Hmmm &#8230;.&#8221;Off&#8221; and &#8220;unsecured&#8221;. That&#8217;s making shades of gray now isn&#8217;t it. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35880</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35880</guid>
		<description>test.I am wondering why my reply came up as "Bob"!!!

tampabbay99</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test.I am wondering why my reply came up as &#8220;Bob&#8221;!!!</p>
<p>tampabbay99</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35878</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35878</guid>
		<description>That would depend on if the lid was off or not secured right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would depend on if the lid was off or not secured right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35875</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoracingsport.com/nascar/wallaces-nationwide-team-wins-daytona-penalty-appeal/#comment-35875</guid>
		<description>So what about the other 4 teams ?? will they get the penalties removed as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what about the other 4 teams ?? will they get the penalties removed as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
